Ir arriba
Información del artículo

Formulation, computation and improvement of steady state security margins in power systems. Part II: results

F.M. Echavarren, E. Lobato, L. Rouco, T. Gómez

International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems Vol. 33, nº. 2, pp. 347 - 358

Resumen:

A steady state security margin for a particular operating point can be defined as the distance from this initial point to the secure operating limits of the system. Four of the most used steady state security margins are the power flow feasibility margin, the contingency feasibility margin, the load margin to voltage collapse, and the total transfer capability between system areas. This is the second part of a two part paper. Part I has proposed a novel framework of a general model able to formulate, compute and improve any steady state security margin. In Part II the performance of the general model is validated by solving a variety of practical situations in modern real power systems. Actual examples of the Spanish power system will be used for this purpose. The same computation and improvement algorithms outlined in Part I have been applied for the four security margins considered in the study, outlining the convenience of defining a general framework valid for the four of them. The general model is used here in Part II to compute and improve: (a) the power flow feasibility margin (assessing the influence of the reactive power generation limits in the Spanish power system), (b) the contingency feasibility margin (assessing the influence of transmission and generation capacity in maintaining a correct voltage profile), (c) the load margin to voltage collapse (assessing the location and quantity of loads that must be shed in order to be far away from voltage collapse) and (d) the total transfer capability (assessing the export import pattern of electric power between different areas of the Spanish system).


Palabras Clave: Steady state analysis; Security margins; Power flow feasibility; Contingency analysis; Voltage collapse; Total transfer capability.


Índice de impacto JCR y cuartil WoS: 2,247 - Q1 (2011); 5,200 - Q1 (2022)

Referencia DOI: DOI icon https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.08.026

Publicado en papel: Febrero 2011.

Publicado on-line: Septiembre 2010.



Cita:
F.M. Echavarren, E. Lobato, L. Rouco, T. Gómez, Formulation, computation and improvement of steady state security margins in power systems. Part II: results. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. Vol. 33, nº. 2, pp. 347 - 358, Febrero 2011. [Online: Septiembre 2010]


    Líneas de investigación:
  • *Régimen permanente: flujos de cargas, análisis de restricciones de operación, flujos de cargas óptimo, servicio complementario de control de tensiones, cortocircuitos, protecciones en redes de transporte y distribución, modelos térmicos de cables

pdf Previsualizar
pdf Solicitar el artículo completo a los autores