Ir arriba
Información del artículo

Chest injuries of elderly Post Mortem Human Surrogates (PMHS) under seat belt and airbag loading in frontal sled impacts. Comparison to matching THOR tests

F.J. López-Valdés, K. Mroz, A. Eggers, B. Pipkorn, J. Muehlbauer, S. Schick, S. Peldschus

Objective: The goal of the study was to develop experimental chest loading conditions that would cause up to AIS 2 chest injuries in elderly occupants in moderate-speed frontal crashes. The new set of experimental data was also intended to be used in the benchmark of existing thoracic injury criteria in lower-speed collision conditions. Methods: Six male elderly (age>63) PMHS were exposed to a 35 km/h (nominal) frontal sled impact. The test fixture consisted of a rigid seat, rigid footrest and a cable seat back. Two restraint conditions (A and B) were compared. Occupants were restrained by a force limited (2.5 kN (A) and 2 kN (B)) seat belt and a pre-inflated (16 kPa (A) and 11 kPa (B)) airbag (see picture). Condition B also incorporated increased seat friction. Matching sled tests were carried out with the THOR M dummy. IRTRACC readings were used to compute chest injury risk. PMHS were exposed to a post-test injury assessment. Tests were carried out in two stages, using the outcome of the first one combined with a parametric study using the THUMS model to adjust the test conditions in the second. All procedures were approved by the relevant Ethics board. Results: Restraint condition A resulted in an unexpected high number of rib fractures (fx) (10 fx, 14 fx, 15 fx). Under condition B, the adjustment of the relative airbag/occupant position combined with a lower airbag pressure and lower seat belt load limit resulted in a reduced pelvic excursion (85 mm vs. 110 mm), increased torso pitch and a substantially lower number of rib fractures (1 fx, 0 fx, 4 fx) as intended. Conclusions: The predicted risk of rib fractures provided by the THOR dummy using the Cmax and PC Score injury criteria were lower than the actual injuries observed in the PMHS tests (especially in restraint condition A). However, the THOR dummy was capable to discriminate between the two restraint scenarios. Similar results were obtained in the parametric study with the THUMS model.


Traffic Injury Prevention.

Aceptado para su publicación.

    Líneas de investigación:
  • Biomecánica
  • Modelado numérico
  • Análisis experimental

Aviso legal  |  Política de cookies |  Política de Privacidad

© Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería - ICAI, Instituto de Investigación Tecnológica

Calle de Santa Cruz de Marcenado, 26 - 28015 Madrid, España - Tel: (+34) 91 5422 800