Summary:
Achieving climate policy goals requires mobilizing public funds to bring still immature clean technologies to competitiveness and create new technological options. The format of direct public support must be tailored to the characteristics of technologies addressed. Based on the experience accumulated with innovation programs, we have identified those features of innovation that should directly condition the choice of direct support instruments. These include the funding gap between the cost of innovation activities and the amount of private funds leveraged; the ability of technologies targeted to compete for public funds in the market; the probability that these technologies fail to reach the market; and the type of entity best suited to conduct these activities. Clean innovation features are matched to those of direct support instruments to provide recommendations on the use to be made of each type of instrument. Given the large financing gap of most clean energy innovation projects, public grants and contracts should finance a large part of clean pre-deployment innovation. However, public loans, equity investments, prizes and tax credits or rebates can successfully support certain innovation processes at a lower public cost. Principles derived are applied to identify the instrument best suited to a case example.
Keywords: Climate policy; Clean energy innovation; Technology push instruments
JCR Impact Factor and WoS quartile: 2,743 - Q1 (2012); 9,000 - Q1 (2022)
DOI reference:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.001
Published on paper: April 2012.
Published on-line: January 2012.
Citation:
L. Olmos, S. Ruester, S.J. Liong, On the selection of financing instruments to push the development of new technologies: Application to clean energy technologies. Energy Policy. Vol. 43, pp. 252 - 266, April 2012. [Online: January 2012]
